Prince Harry has been told he should move to Zimbabwe following his remarks on the United States’ First Amendment that protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Joe Siracusa, a professor at Curtin University in Perth, Australia, said the Duke of Sussex should not have gone to the United States if he did not want to be in the news.
Professor Siracusa said the Duke’s whole life has been under the microscope, so he moved to the US with his wife Meghan Markle, where there is “freedom of expression”.He told Sky News Australia:
_If Harry doesn’t understand that he’s in the crosshairs of the American paparazzi, that is the American media, then he ought to go for a long walk somewhere and move to Zimbabwe or some Asian village or maybe some Chinese fishing village somewhere.__Because he’s going to be news now._
_I find him completely unremarkable myself._
Siracusa made the remarks after Harry had criticised the amendment describing it as crazy. The Duke’s remarks led to a huge backlash and claims it could threaten his popularity in America.
Harry, 36, appeared to blast the US constitution during a chat with actor Dax Shepherd on the Armchair Expert podcast. He said:
_I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers.__I don’t want to start going down the First Amendment route because that’s a huge subject and one which I don’t understand because I’ve only been here a short time, but you can find a loophole in anything._
Harry is advised to move to Zimbabwe a Southern African country whose government is accused of infringing the freedom of speech, the press, and assembly.